Wanted Posters and the Human Rights Act

Via Not Saussure, the Daily Mail, Radio 5 News this morning and a 8 month old Telegraph article - Human Rights Act Stops Cops Using Wanted Posters Shock.

In particular, the case this morning was about escaped prisoners (the Telegraph article was related to the prisoner release scandal, aka the Safety Elephant Gun (well, it got him fired, ho ho).

A Chief constable was accused of 'madness' last night after refusing to release pictures of two escaped murderers amid fears it might breach their human rights.

However, unfortunately for the ignorant and foolish who look for any opportunity to bash Britain's great contribution to postwar human rights it turns out to be bollocks. The BBC has rather moved on from its panic-stations pseudo tabloidism (mind you, that's the Breakfast Show on Radio 5 for you) in its later article. The actual pictures of the escaped suspects on the page rather suggests that the wanted posters are in the public domain.

A moment's thought will illustrate why wanted posters of escaped convicts can't possibly infringe their human rights.

1) They were in jail
2) Because they were found guilty of a crime
3) This means their identity and mugshot (unless they're under age) is in the public domain at time of sentencing.
4) They should still be in jail

Clearly, if a sentenced prisoner's face and name is in the public domain when he's first sentenced, this doesn't stop as soon as he legs it over the wall. Derbyshire police appear to be playing silly buggers here, and even Lord Falconer's on the sensible side for once:

The Lord Chancellor, Lord Falconer, said the suggestion that the Human Rights Act may have prevented publication of the photographs was "absolute nonsense".

He said he wanted "some explanation" as to why the images of the two convicts had not been put out.

I suspect the explanation lies somewhere between police embarrassment about the press asking them where the men had gone in the two months since they escaped and, frankly, prison service incompetence at keeping prisoners actually on the inside. The original excuse smacks of desperation, but particularly given the way this false meme (and other similar examples) has spread throughout the right-wing authoritarian community, a bit of distraction from the real story would doubtless be very welcome.

A lot of scare stories in tabloids come from police sources, of course, repeated and amplified by Mad Mel, the Mad Mail, the News of the World etc. Usually a right-wing Tory can be relied upon to chime in, and in the end someone will drag that prize tit David Blunkett to give us the benefit of his dubious mentality. Making loud noises about the HRA is much easier than actually addressing the overstretch and rock-bottom morale in the prison and probation services.

There's a slight giveaway in the BBC's related story column, about a near identical incident with the Derbyshire force late last year, complete with mugshot. Not a lot has changed in two months with regard to the Human Rights Act, so why the kerfuffle today?

P.S. Checking the league table for police performance, Derbyshire came joint 27th out of 42.

P.P.S. Because of Home Office targets, police forces are bolstering their detection figures with spot fines and cannabis cautions (that leaked Number 10 briefing paper the other day). It would be nice if there were targets for, say, recapturing escaped convicted murderers within a couple of months.

The human rights excuse has

The human rights excuse has replaced the data protection act excuse that replaced the computer error excuse and the police have pioneered them all, bless 'em.

Actually, the police line

Actually, the police line was that the double-whammy of HRA and DPA that was apparently to blame, at least until about lunchtime when they owned up.

What has surprised me (well,

What has surprised me (well, maybe not surprised, just appalled) is that the head of the Prison Service has admitted that he doesn't have any idea how many prisoners are on the run. It shouldn't be too difficult, even without a centralised system, for some under-employed bureaucrat to ring up every nick and ask, "how many have you got and how many should you have?" But then, that's using logic to solve the problem, not something that is in common supply at the Home Office.

I was genuinely surprised, however, that murderers are housed in open prisons which I had thought were reserved for low risk, non-violent offenders. Silly me.

This story is insane. This

This story is insane.

This man and anyone else like him should be fired and prosecuted for putting the public at risk.

Sure there are a variety of specific offences on the statute books for this.

Given the recent story about police tribunals being held in public, this should be the first.

I think it goes much deeper

I think it goes much deeper than that. Police forces across Britain are increasingly playing politics. They are getting involved in the process of changing our laws by creating fears that dont really exist, then asking for new powers to correct and protect those fears.

There is a campaign going on within Parliament at present to get the HRA watered down or abolished, so this just goes some way to justify removing some more of our rights, i.e. police cannot do their job unless we remove the HRA as it hinders us... blah

There is something very nasty going on in Britain today.
http://thejournal.parker-joseph.co.uk/blog/_archives/2007/1/3/2616067.html