The Return of the Dodgy Dossier
Posted March 1st, 2007 by quarsan
The dossier that just won't go away. New Statesman journalist, Chris Ames, has been digging very seriously and the latest issue has the results of his investigation and his hopes for the imminent release of the first draft, something that is expected to demolish claims that the 45 minute part was in from the beginning and show that the document was indeed 'sexed up'. Chris is right, this is an important day for truth seekers, not only because of the new site examining the document in incredible detail, sourced detail.
The truth will always come
The truth will always come out!
It would appear that the poodle's many attempts to obscure the truth about so many of his evil deeds are unravelling.
I hope he lives to rue the day he entered into his Faustian pact with Bush.
Let's hope the rest of the poodle's followers are exposed as well.
There's some good info on
There's some good info on that site. John Williams, who apparently wrote the 1st draft of the dodgy dossier, has formed his own company specialising in bullshit www.westonecommunications.com/index.html. You can phone him directly to ask all about it: 07768 992016
I am spitting mad about the
I am spitting mad about the injustice of it all.
Did Kelly really commit suicide; now no longer looks like another looney conspiricay theory. Scarlet has got his K or P (should have been the rough end of a pineapple up his ...). Duncan Cambell has had his million for his book. Bliar continues with bullshit and denial.
Perhaps, just perhaps, one day what goes around will come around.
The Blair WAR SPEECH was
The Blair WAR SPEECH was LONG.
A very few lines were devoted to the man whose tongue was torn out in the Baghdad street, and left to die.
Maybe this was true, or ........ NOT ?
Seemed like Campbell overkill at the time (no foul pun intended) , is there any way this claim could be sourced ?
I think of Kuweit incubators 1991, small kids hands cut off by the 'Huns' 1914 or 15. ....
It's far less complicated than the 45minutes, but almost as interesting.
You locals can tell me if this was widely repeated in the Press ---- my feeling is that it looked like a non-runner, best left alone, chaps.
I may be wrong in my suspicion. Only one way of checking, ask somebody .
frog Do you remember this
frog
Do you remember this report from Ann Clwyd?
The human shredder, which was supposed to be at Baghdad's notorious Abu Ghraib prison, has yet to be found.
Last year Britain's Spectator magazine set out to track down the source of the shredder claim, starting with the Times article that was written by a British Labour member of parliament, Ann Clwyd.
Clwyd chaired a group called Indict, which had been campaigning against the Baathist regime that supported Saddam. She had written on March 18, 2003, that male prisoners were dropped into the machine "designed for shredding plastic" and their minced remains packed into plastic bags before being used as "fish food".
Or am I barking at the wrong bush?
LIFESA -- overwhelmed with
LIFESA -- overwhelmed with surprise as I am, well-found source !
All goes to show "that many hands make light work" ......BLABLA.....
REAL DEMOCRACY might be rather like this. Much discussion from us grassroots rather than imposed bullshit , and worse...
While were discussing
While were discussing Clewyds courxces, lets remember Andrew Gilligan who came under enormous pressure to name his source because he found another incidence where out that the criminals squatting in Downing were lying (sex me up baby!). But these nonny sources giving fictitious details of shredders, bombs being manufactured in the houses of British Muslims, nonny sources describing how a 9-11 style attack on Canary Wharf , of liquid bombs, of sources that inform BBC journalists that WTC7 fell, while still standing and most beautifully of all perhaps SADDAMS BOMB (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/correspondent/1191203.stm) never have to name their sources. Along with a few other Journalists especially Frank Garnder I think its clear what’s going on in the Ministry of truth at Portland Place and Whitehall.
And Bliar lies have led to
And Bliar lies have led to this mess in Iraq.
www.flurl.com/item/THOFIR_FEB_07_u_232975
maybe Tony should be made to watch those videos to get a handle on the situation over there.
Let me be pedantic. The
Let me be pedantic. The "Dodgy Dossier" was the one produced in February 2003, which was so dodgy that nobody took much notice of it. You are presumably referring in this article to the "Sexed-up Dossier" of September 2002, which did at least pretend to be based on intelligence material. Of course by March 2003 the Inspectors had examined all the intelligence in the "Sexed-up Dossier" and rubbished it, but Blair was still saying "We know that Iraq has WMD". It's interesting to note that Blair and his cronies are still sticking grimly to the story that the invasion of Iraq was legal, even though they are also promoting the general idea of illegal military interventions (eg invading Afghanistan and Iraq to change their values). I can only guess that they are afraid of retribution from someone (the Army ?) if they admit that there wasn't really any evidence of WMD and/or the invasion was illegal.
Cl`wyd's posturing
Cl`wyd's posturing re-Saddam's Iraq,her concerns for the Marsh Arabs are all so much bullshit.
The woman is batty.Without a shred of credibilklty.