Exporting Our Values
Posted April 1st, 2007 by Davide Simonetti
in
What does the Home Office do when a teenage Zimbabwean asylum seeker, who was married to a member of the persecuted opposition party and claims to have been raped by a senior ally of the Mugabe regime, exposes a major sex-for-asylum scandal in the Immigration Service in which she herself was a victim and which resulted in a Home Office minister being moved from his post?
Answer: It deports her to Zimbabwe.
Despite Tony Blair calling what is happening in Zimbabwe "appalling, disgraceful and utterly tragic", he is still prepared to deport hundreds of Zimbabweans and to try and convince hundreds more to return to that ruined country.
What was that about "our values" again Tony?
New Labour don't want 15,000
New Labour don't want 15,000 white asylum seekers from Zimbabwe to be able to come to the UK and vote Conservative, hence the Home Office's attempt to deport Zimbabweans.
"New Labour don't want
"New Labour don't want 15,000 white asylum seekers from Zimbabwe..."
New Labour don't want 15,000 elderly , impoverished, unemployable, people who will be a burden on social and health services, housing by white asylum seekers from Zimbabwe.
But Tony doesn't HAVE any
But Tony doesn't HAVE any values. It's like expecting fair play from an Iranian, or truth from the Palestinians, or sense from a member of the British Council of Muslims. But marginally less likely.
It's like expecting fair
It's like expecting fair play from an Iranian, or truth from the Palestinians, or sense from a member of the British Council of Muslims.
What a silly little racist you are. The very same attitude that allows the western governments to slaughter hundreds and thousands of people without opposition.
Sorry to say that I am
Sorry to say that I am removing Blairwatch from my favourites. If you so many bloggers as members here, you miss so much material to rant at. Bye
"If you so many bloggers as
"If you so many bloggers as members here, you miss so much material to rant at. Bye"
Can someone translate?
Sorry to say Beachutman that
Sorry to say Beachutman that that is the sort of attitude that lets politicians go on TV and air negative views on veil wearing to incite the public to think that there is an issue with all Muslims. It's very narrow minded.
When ones life,liberty and
When ones life,liberty and future is at stake , it pays to be "narrow-minded".Racism is a genetic response necessary for self-preservation,every-one would rather live with people of thier own kind,this is natural,and any-one who would deliberately suppress it ,only invites a self-destructive mental illness,which is evidenced by the irrational conduct of bliar and the self-hating loonies of the left.
"When ones life,liberty and
"When ones life,liberty and future is at stake , it pays to be "narrow-minded".Racism is a genetic response necessary for self-preservation,every-one would rather live with people of thier own kind,this is natural,and any-one who would deliberately suppress it ,only invites a self-destructive mental illness,which is evidenced by the irrational conduct of bliar and the self-hating loonies of the left."
Rubbish. Racism as a natural trait? Maybe. But because something is 'natural' does not automatically endow that thing with positive traits.
'Naturally', even more people should die every year than do thanks to the intervention of 'unnatural' medical treatment and advances in science
'Naturally', women can begin menstruating at 12 years of age, but thankfully, the vast majority people in our society recognise that sexual maturity is not the same thing as emotional maturity
'Naturally', humans should be in no way troubled at the prospect of slaughtering others of our species in competition for resources. I agree we'll withhold judgement on that one, but at least the perception in most societies is a negative one. If you disagree, I'm sure someone will hand you a rifle and pack you off to meet the Iraqis, who will greet you with itchy trigger fingers for what's been done to them.
Supposedly we evolve beyond our programming and progress as a species, often against precisely the kind of attitude you display. If you think racism is to be welcomed as a natural trait I suggest you find a handy tree and climb up, pausing occasionally to throw your own excrement at trespassers on your territory. Perhaps the sky Gods will send lightning to help you kill the dark skinned ones. Idiot.
Andy Nepotism and racism are
Andy
Nepotism and racism are just opposite ends of the same behaviour scale.
Both may be disapproved of, but both happen, and wont ever be eliminated.
If you were in a position to award a good job to someone and your brother desperately needed it and could do it, would you give said job to a stranger - even a stranger from the other side of town, never mind the other side of the world?
Get real.
I don't believe I implied
I don't believe I implied racism doesn't happen, or that it can be eliminated. What I did suggest is that implying that it is a healthy thing because it is 'natural' is hardly reasonable. Nepotism and Racism opposite ends of the same behaviour scale? They may stem from some of the same instincts, but their meaning is rather different:
Nepotism - favouritism shown to relatives or friends, especially by giving them jobs.
Racism - discrimination against or antagonism towards other races.
You're right - I might well give the job to my brother, if he merited it on ability - that's nepotism. I would not however proceed to attack, or at the extreme, march the unsuccessful candidates into a gas chamber based on their ethnic origin. Nepotism and Racism are the 'same'? And you tell me to get real.
No, sorry Stewart that's
No, sorry Stewart that's completely off the mark bud, Beachhuts comment contained the components of Blair has no values (which is incorrect, Blair has loads of values, it's just his warped interpretation of them that's the issue) and this is because he has the same principles as all Iranians, Palestinians, and the Council of Muslims. That is plain wrong, it is a comment that diminishes those people and unfairly so when based on how someone 'feels' and I'm afraid that it is the same mentality that leads to:
'When ones life,liberty and future is at stake , it pays to be "narrow-minded"'
Because let's face it all Iranians, Palestinians, and the council of Muslims are threatening are life, liberty, and future aren't they ? I mean every day that I'm campaigning against the ID when really I should be worried about the Palestinians coming over here and stealing all my liberties and shooting me so I don't have a future, is that about right?
However you are correct that there is a natural desire to stick with ones own kind, yes it is an evolutionary thing and it makes sense in a system that has been around for millions of years in development, and it makes no sense in a modern context that has evolved into society in a thousand years. However, as I mentioned in my first post, it is the politician that uses this natural trait to push ideas into stupid peoples heads that what threatens our society, I mean really really really is going to drive it into the ground is Aishah Azmi wearing a veil, look how different they are, they are separate, grab yer pichforks you dribbling mass of educated fools and go and get rid of the threat.
See what I mean? Sorry Stewie, you are an example of the good little boy the Government want and you have illustrated my initial comment far better than I.
Racism is a belief, it is
Racism is a belief, it is not innate. As with other beliefs, racism is transfered through culture and upbringing.
The underlying instinct that motivates racism is xenophobia, and this is innate. However, as with other neuroses, xenophobia can largely be overcome through critical thinking and exposure to and awareness of other cultures and peoples.
The ideology of racism was promoted largely as a justification for European colonialism. This is no longer the case and education is winning.
Andy, what I was trying to
Andy, what I was trying to say in a nice way was that nepotism and racism are exactly the same thing. There are widening circles of effect, the inner circle is labelled nepotism, then through several layers to the outer, which is labelled racism. Any social psychologist can tell you this.
These labels are, of course, socially defined. By people like you. They could all be differently socially defined. We live inside a B-vocabulary at the moment. It won't always be so.
And it's you who mentioned extermination, no one else.
You might also wish to take into account competition for scarce resources on an overcrowded small island ... and getting more overcrowded by the day. Suggest you experience life at the bottom of the heap along with people like me - and others who you insult by calling racist when all they're doing is trying to survive inside an insane social machine.
Do you know this woman? Probably not, so why do you care a damn about her. She's here illegally (again socially defined) so she's got to go. All rather simple really. You'll note that it was a fellow countryman of hers that was abusing his powers ...
Andy , i do not believe that
Andy , i do not believe that i insulted you, so why insult me meerly for having an opinion that differs from yours?It should be patiently obvious to the majority of English people that the muslims are not inclined to live in peace with us,and the same is true of the negro who wishes to spend his life in indolence at our expense while expecting to be honoured for his savagery.mugabe is a racist,so too mandella,mbeki,and the worst is yet to come in south africa,in the shape of zama,it seems perfectly acceptable for white rhodesians to be murdered on thier farms,or dispossessed of thier land,while all that the bleeding heart liberals care about are some parasites being returned to thier own country,the same applies to south africa,another notable communist triumph,but the very people who instigated the chaos and proclaimed the "rainbow nation"fled at the earliest opportunity.
Races are not "equal" if they were , would they invade our country in such numbers as we see at present,would they not have built civilized societies akin to ours,it can not be a question of resources,for in that respect they are infinitely richer than we are, it is our genetic make up that caused us to evolve the way we have,natural selection,and these genes are absolutely racist,deny them if you will it will make no difference to the agenda of the universe.
April Fool! ...um, it is,
April Fool!
...um, it is, right?