Whose Security? What Intelligence?
Whose Security? What Intelligence?
The Need for an Independent Public Inquiry into the 7/7 London Bombings
Public launch of new report
"Inside the Crevice: Islamist terror networks and the 7/7 intelligence failure", by Nafeez Ahmed
6.30-9pm Weds 3 October 2007
at Garden Court Chambers, Lincoln's Inn Fields, WC2 (Holborn tube station)
Chair: Frances Webber Garden Court Chambers
Speakers include:
Nafeez Ahmed Institute for Policy Research & Development (IPRD)
Detective Superintendent (ret.) Des Thomas former Deputy Head, CID Constabulary, Hampshire
Les Levidow CAMPACC
Rachel North 7/7 survivor, author, Out of the Tunnel
James Oury Oury Clark Solicitors, representing the 7/7 Inquiry Group
Why was London attacked on 7th July 2005? Why were the attacks not prevented? Initial government responses claimed the Islamist terrorists were 'clean skins', previously unknown to the security services; therefore more staff and more severe anti-terror measures are needed to prevent future attacks. But there are great discrepancies in the government's account of events leading up to 7/7, in particular Operation Crevice. Moreover, British 'security' policies at home and abroad have systematically undermined public safety for over the last decade. Meanwhile, 'anti-terror' powers are serving to divert attention and resources from real threats of terrorist attacks in this country.
This critique has been developed in a parliamentary briefing paper, Inside the Crevice. In August 2007 it was circulated to members of several UK parliamentary committees, including the Intelligence & Security Committee, Home Affairs Committee, Defence Committee, Foreign Affairs Committee, Joint Human Rights Committee, and Communities & Local Government Committee, as well as ministers and government officials.
The report is cited in the pre-action protocol letter drafted by Oury Clark Solicitors on behalf of the 7/7 Inquiry Group, sent to the Home Secretary. It is also cited in their application for judicial review of the government's decision not to hold an inquiry into the London bombings. Key themes and questions raised in the report, which calls for radical reform of British security policies, will be discussed at this event.
Co-Sponsored by
Baroness Helena Kennedy QC;
Institute for Policy Research & Development [IPRD] www.globalcrisis.org.uk;
Campaign Against Criminalising Communities [CAMPACC] www.campacc.org.uk;
Garden Court Chambers, www.gardencourtchambers.co.uk;
Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers, www.haldane.org
For full text of report go to www.globalcrisis.org.uk
Information:
Nafeez Ahmed e-mail nafeez@globalcrisis.org.uk Tel 07860 825 735 or
CAMPACC e-mail estella24@tiscali.co.uk Tel 020 7586 5892
Pilot who flew 2 planes used
Pilot who flew 2 planes used on 9/11 doesn't believe official story
video.google.com/videoplay
the point is that if 911is a lie then I´m 100% that the London fiasco is also a lie.
'those with nothing to hide
'those with nothing to hide have nothing to fear...' is the mantra of the politician when they are trying to force their draconian, anti-democratic world on the unsuspecting public.
Whether it's increased surveillance, tooling up the police with the weapons of an oppressive third world dictatorship, or simply removing any accountability for their actions, this is the line they come out with.
So why do these same politicians not want in independent investigation? Because they are fearful, because they do have something to hide. Of course 7/7 was a stitch-up, you don't need to be a frigging detective to know that. They know it too but heaven forbid that we should discover what a bunch of treacherous criminals have taken over the UK government, not only in this country either.
I hear France is now supporting the US plans to bomb Iran - is it a coincidence that a Zionist is now the French President? We must flush-out the supporters of Zionism from British politics as their agenda is a direct challenge to democracy, peace and freedom - those things you hear politicians talk a lot about, but whose actions demonstrate a desire for the complete opposite.
The NAZI'S are in power in
The NAZI'S are in power in the west. I am at present having it out with Barroso, but he is very slow at answering very simple questions, that are backed by hard evidence, which cannot be denied. Barroso knows the Treaty of Amsterdam is a sham, as is the so called EU Treaty and the Berlin Declaration. They will never be used to defend the rights of the citizen against thug regimes.
This is the reason why the EU, along with the German government, were trying to get a ban on NAZI insignia. It is their way of trying to prove they are not NAZI'S, meanwhile there is a NAZI law floating around in Europe, that they are only too happy to use for their own purpose. If these people are prepared to abuse their own people, they obviously have little respect for others.
They are fully aware that to challenge me in court would be the same as playing Russian roulette with six bullets, where they make the first move. I know how they RIG the courts. I have offered Barroso a chance to meet on TV, where he can explain the evidence I have to support my statement of facts.
The NAZI'S are in power in
The NAZI'S are in power in the west.
Doubleplusungood
When will people wake up to that fact?.
Hi, George Dutton, I can
Hi, George Dutton, I can make this statement of fact because I have the evidence that no politician wants to discuss, in the so called 'Democratic West.' Not one has said I do not have a case, but they refuse to take it up.
Hence, the reason why I am denied the right to legal representation, to challenge them in a court in the so called 'Democratic West.' The evidence is so clear, and it takes only a few minutes to read it, to understand how ordinary folk are thought of by those in power. Believe me, we have absolutely no rights, if we dare to challenge those in power. Criminals of the most horrendous type have far more rights, than anyone who dares to defend Democracy.
It is also of interest as to how a Turkish newspaper published my story concerning NAZISM in the EU yet it was not picked up by the media within the EU. There must be a story, or Barroso would have tried to sue Hurriyet, as the report carried a letter which proved I had correspondence with him, on the subject of NAZISM within the EU.
"Conservative Leader David
"Conservative Leader David Cameron has failed once again to benefit significantly from the government’s difficulties. But this is because his party is as hated and mistrusted as Labour—and as out of touch. He even chose to pontificate about the dangers facing “every business and family in the country” in a speech to a meeting of international accountancy firm KPMG and in the pages of the Sunday Telegraph."
"The real danger facing the government is not a transfer of voter allegiance from one right-wing party to another, but a decisive shift to the left in the working class and an eruption of sharp class conflicts."
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2007/sep2007/bank-s20.shtml
Who is Cameron kidding with saying "eruption of sharp class conflicts" we already have it.
"Robert Shiller, a liberal Yale economist who correctly predicted the collapse of the dot.com bubble, told the panel that “the collapse of home prices might turn out to be the most severe since the Great Depression."
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2007/sep2007/econ-s20.shtml
While everyone is thinking it`s all about housing, I am thinking it`s all about the world economy as a whole.
All this talk of NAZI's is
All this talk of NAZI's is highly emotive and misleading. The fact that the Nazis were a bunch of fascists does not make all fascists Nazis, Mussolini and Hirohito were not Nazis.
Fascism has existed in the West since the Romans. The biggest fascists of all at the moment are the Fundamental Christian Zionists and 'the chosen people' who appear to be attempting to control the entire planet, much as they do in the West at present, with a sham democracy, propaganda media and massive secret service/intelligence agencies that are actually in place to control the population and not, as the politicians would have you believe, protect 'our' security. They only protect the security of big business and politicians, and ensure that we all live in a state of ignorance and fear.
Once a group of people place themselves as more important than others, being 'better' than others, blessed by God, having superior morals etc. etc. then they are defacto fascists.
CBS) PELLEY: One last
CBS) PELLEY: One last thing. So important for the American people to understand. When your airplane approaches Manhattan this week, you will look out the window and you will see that the World Trade Center is gone. Many Americans, Mr. President, to be frank, believe that you look out that window and you say to yourself, "Good. Somebody got 'em." They believe our countries are enemies.
AHMADEINEJAD: Well, you shouldn't speak on behalf of the American people. I can speak on behalf of the Iranian people, but you cannot speak on behalf of the American people. Why do you insist on doing that? Why do you not allow the American people to speak for themselves? Why? Let them speak for themselves. The people gathered around the White House a couple of days ago. They spoke whatever was in their hearts and minds. Are they not American citizens? Hundreds of thousands of people have rallied against the war. Are they not citizens? Our government at the time expressed its condemnation. We issued an official communiqué condemning that incident. How can you, in your mind, accuse and condemn others? Well, if an Iranian person for that matter had done the same thing, it would have been shameful, and it would not have been fair. So, again, this is not fair. Maybe this is your point of view or also perhaps your editor's point of view. And you are saying that the American people are saying these things. The American people still don't know who was behind the bombing of the Twin Towers. Many books in the U.S. have been written about the incident., and there are questions circling in your society. Once you go back, go to the streets, ask the local people who was behind this, what were the reason for that? And, again, I fail to see why you continually say “the American people.“ I have the latest surveys. Eighty percent of the American citizens say that the American government knew about the attack beforehand. They had information.
PELLEY: You don't believe that, sir.
AHMADEINEJAD: I'm not making a judgment here, mind you. I'm not being judgmental. That's not important for me. What is important for me is to find out why this happened. We can take a course of action which ensures this never happens. Why should we manage the world like this? It's very possible for us all to be friends, for the world to be in peace, and for the family of man to love one another and to not hate one another. So who propagates these ideas, I ask you. We should all be friends. We should deal fairly with one another, respect one another. Nations do not have any problems when it comes to interacting with one another. Unethical politicians make war. Nations don't make war. We're saying that you should allow our nations to be friends with one another. We condemned that incident right there and then. Why should many innocent people be killed? For what reason? Well, behind this building there is another building, a building which in 1360 Iranian calendar, some 25 years ago, the Iranian president and the prime minister in the office, they were blown up by terrorists, a bomb planted by terrorists. And the president and the prime minister burned in that bomb, by that bomb. And, again, this is very regrettable that those terrorists, which were behind that bombing and other assassinations in this country, can freely have access to American officials are being protected by the American Army in Iraq. So this country is a victim of terrorism throughout its history. So you cannot produce even one document, a single document, about terrorist action on the part of the Iranian government or Iranian officials. We are very clear in our position. We say that we spiritually support the right of the Palestinian people and also independence for Iraq. We have nothing to hide. We are very much opposed to the Iraqi occupation. Again, we have nothing to hide. It's very regrettable that many thousands of people were killed in the Twin Tower incident. We have announced time and again. And what we are asking is can we do something that ensures this never happens? And the answer is "yes." We can do that, providing a number of parties do not establish terrorist organizations and set them off on nations. We know who is behind terrorist organizations. You know full well who is behind a number of terrorist organizations around my part of the world, that is. Who provided them with logistical support, political support? It's a very well-known fact they have made and created these terrorist organizations themselves.
PELLEY: Who, sir?
AHMADINEJAD: It's very clear. Very clear.
PELLEY: Make it clearer. Name the names.
AHMADEINEJAD: I don't want to name names. I don't want to name names. But the terrorist organizations in Afghanistan, who is behind them? And what intelligence organization belonging to what country is behind them? This is very clear.
PELLEY: Shall I say CIA and the United States? Will that . . .
AHMADEINEJAD: Well, maybe you know something that . . . The relations and the developments in this part of the world are somewhat clear. I don't want to say something which would agitate and fan the flames of the situation. What I'm saying that this is shameful. My country is a great victim of terrorism. We very much oppose terrorism. As I said, we oppose terrorism. Why? Why should innocent people be killed? For what reason? We are saying that each and every person should be respected regardless of their color, creed, what country they come from, what language they speak. We're all fellow human beings. We should be respected. Why some parties ask more than their fair share? Why do they insult nations? They shouldn't do that. This is not right.
PELLEY: Would you reestablish . . .
AHMADEINEJAD: If I may. Who created secret prisons in Europe? You don't know that? Did Iran establish those prisons? This one is very clear and the documents have been revealed. Why are they creating secret prisons? If the law provides the possibility to establish these prisons, go ahead. Why this skullduggery? So this is, again, very clear. CBS) PELLEY: One last thing. So important for the American people to understand. When your airplane approaches Manhattan this week, you will look out the window and you will see that the World Trade Center is gone. Many Americans, Mr. President, to be frank, believe that you look out that window and you say to yourself, "Good. Somebody got 'em." They believe our countries are enemies.
AHMADEINEJAD: Well, you shouldn't speak on behalf of the American people. I can speak on behalf of the Iranian people, but you cannot speak on behalf of the American people. Why do you insist on doing that? Why do you not allow the American people to speak for themselves? Why? Let them speak for themselves. The people gathered around the White House a couple of days ago. They spoke whatever was in their hearts and minds. Are they not American citizens? Hundreds of thousands of people have rallied against the war. Are they not citizens? Our government at the time expressed its condemnation. We issued an official communiqué condemning that incident. How can you, in your mind, accuse and condemn others? Well, if an Iranian person for that matter had done the same thing, it would have been shameful, and it would not have been fair. So, again, this is not fair. Maybe this is your point of view or also perhaps your editor's point of view. And you are saying that the American people are saying these things. The American people still don't know who was behind the bombing of the Twin Towers. Many books in the U.S. have been written about the incident., and there are questions circling in your society. Once you go back, go to the streets, ask the local people who was behind this, what were the reason for that? And, again, I fail to see why you continually say “the American people.“ I have the latest surveys. Eighty percent of the American citizens say that the American government knew about the attack beforehand. They had information.
PELLEY: You don't believe that, sir.
AHMADEINEJAD: I'm not making a judgment here, mind you. I'm not being judgmental. That's not important for me. What is important for me is to find out why this happened. We can take a course of action which ensures this never happens. Why should we manage the world like this? It's very possible for us all to be friends, for the world to be in peace, and for the family of man to love one another and to not hate one another. So who propagates these ideas, I ask you. We should all be friends. We should deal fairly with one another, respect one another. Nations do not have any problems when it comes to interacting with one another. Unethical politicians make war. Nations don't make war. We're saying that you should allow our nations to be friends with one another. We condemned that incident right there and then. Why should many innocent people be killed? For what reason? Well, behind this building there is another building, a building which in 1360 Iranian calendar, some 25 years ago, the Iranian president and the prime minister in the office, they were blown up by terrorists, a bomb planted by terrorists. And the president and the prime minister burned in that bomb, by that bomb. And, again, this is very regrettable that those terrorists, which were behind that bombing and other assassinations in this country, can freely have access to American officials are being protected by the American Army in Iraq. So this country is a victim of terrorism throughout its history. So you cannot produce even one document, a single document, about terrorist action on the part of the Iranian government or Iranian officials. We are very clear in our position. We say that we spiritually support the right of the Palestinian people and also independence for Iraq. We have nothing to hide. We are very much opposed to the Iraqi occupation. Again, we have nothing to hide. It's very regrettable that many thousands of people were killed in the Twin Tower incident. We have announced time and again. And what we are asking is can we do something that ensures this never happens? And the answer is "yes." We can do that, providing a number of parties do not establish terrorist organizations and set them off on nations. We know who is behind terrorist organizations. You know full well who is behind a number of terrorist organizations around my part of the world, that is. Who provided them with logistical support, political support? It's a very well-known fact they have made and created these terrorist organizations themselves.
PELLEY: Who, sir?
AHMADINEJAD: It's very clear. Very clear.
PELLEY: Make it clearer. Name the names.
AHMADEINEJAD: I don't want to name names. I don't want to name names. But the terrorist organizations in Afghanistan, who is behind them? And what intelligence organization belonging to what country is behind them? This is very clear.
PELLEY: Shall I say CIA and the United States? Will that . . .
AHMADEINEJAD: Well, maybe you know something that . . . The relations and the developments in this part of the world are somewhat clear. I don't want to say something which would agitate and fan the flames of the situation. What I'm saying that this is shameful. My country is a great victim of terrorism. We very much oppose terrorism. As I said, we oppose terrorism. Why? Why should innocent people be killed? For what reason? We are saying that each and every person should be respected regardless of their color, creed, what country they come from, what language they speak. We're all fellow human beings. We should be respected. Why some parties ask more than their fair share? Why do they insult nations? They shouldn't do that. This is not right.
PELLEY: Would you reestablish . . .
AHMADEINEJAD: If I may. Who created secret prisons in Europe? You don't know that? Did Iran establish those prisons? This one is very clear and the documents have been revealed. Why are they creating secret prisons? If the law provides the possibility to establish these prisons, go ahead. Why this skullduggery? So this is, again, very clear.