White House To Brown - 'Up Yours, Pal'
Oh dear. Via Think Progress, the Telegraph has an article attracting attention Stateside:
Toys out of pram time - there's currently a row in the US about Rush Limbaugh's accusations that military personnel opposed to the war are 'phony soldiers' so it's not surprising to find the administration is now blaming British soldiers. They've blamed the Democrats, the Iraqis and the media for the failure in Iraq, next up its your own troops and your loyal allies. Classy. I'd like to see how the Sun sorts that one out, but their support for Our Boys was never more than skin-deep anyway.
The end of a beautiful friendship? Can't imagine that one playing well. Here's 'Keith' among the 230 comments:
It all goes back to the B-man, of course. Parting is such sweet sorrow:
Well, quite, he's not a complete idiot and he wants to carry on as Prime Minister. Blair has made neoconservative policies equal to electoral suicide, which brings us to the Conservative Party:
Add in Michael Ancram's hosting of Bombs Away Bolton last week, Liam Fox's chumminess with appalling Republicans plus the known views of Cameron's chums Ed Vaizey, George Osbourne and Michael Gove, and it's clear that the neocon parasites are seeking a new host, but the Tories aren't going to win and the list of countries that have rejected the US mixture of imperialist hegemony and criminal incompetence is getting larger all the time. Only Sarkozy is on-side in Europe and safe - the Polish nutters are in electoral trouble, Howard in Australia is facing a tough one, Blair's gone, Aznar's gone, Berlusconi's gone, Angela 'Mrs. Gordon Brown' Merkel is 'disappointing', apparently. Cameron's idea of being the 'Heir to Blair' is looking as daft now as it did a few months back.
Note to Monsieur Le President - according to the last Pew survey the French are slightly behind Turkey in disapproving of practically everything about the modern US state and George Bush in particular. Let's hope some public spirited citizens let him know in the traditional French manner, eh?
Ref the 'Phony Soldiers'
Ref the 'Phony Soldiers' row; I've commented on some interesting stuff on a US military blog and linked to it from here
Sabretache Blog
The Telegraph is getting
The Telegraph is getting more and more schizophrenic in its foreign policy reporting - obviously reflecting the split in Tory ranks between realists and lunatics.
Tony Harnden is posting from Washington a series of anti-neocon stories, including this one on David Wurmser:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/05/wiran205.xml
Bush approval ratings have
Bush approval ratings have hit a new low - 31%!
I know, I know....that many??
BUSH'S WAR ON AMERICAN
BUSH'S WAR ON AMERICAN CHILDREN...
Children marched to the White House Oct. 2 pulling red wagons filled with petitions demanding that President Bush drop his plan to veto legislation passed by the Senate and House that would extend the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) and expand it to cover an additional 4 million children.
http://desertpeace.blogspot.com/
Bush chooses war and tobacco
Bush chooses war and tobacco company profits over childrens health care...
http://tinyurl.com/2uuglu
Is that the same
Is that the same chicken-hawk coward Rush Limbaugh who chickened out of Vietnam because of an ingrowing arse hair?
Worth listening to then.
Is this the same chickenhawk
Is this the same chickenhawk coward Rush Limbaugh who sat out the Vietnam War on a rubber doughnut because of an alleged ingrowing arse hair?
How long must we listen to cowardly armchair warriors sending other people to fight their wars when they're too spineless to do it themselves eg: John Bolton, Monkey Bush, Darth Cheney, Rush Arse-Absyss, Perle, Wolfovitz, Joe Lieberman, Bill Clinton, Blair and Brown?
George Bush and Gordon Brown
George Bush and Gordon Brown win strictly come dancing! Meanwhile the politics and practicalities of corruption & greed twirl on. Baffling.
It's all BOUNCE then is
It's all BOUNCE then is it? This appears to the word of the moment. The Brown BOUNCE at the Labour Party Conference, closely followed by the Cameron BOUNCE at the Tory Conference.
Does this relate possibly to the BOUNCE in a cheque, as in being dishonestly issued, and basically worth sod all?
At least the postponing of the election allows the peasants a bit more time to find a coin to flip, to help them decide who to vote for, the Devil or his Advocate.
I suppose we could ask the fairer sex to help us decide who is the best looking out the two ugly mugs, the mind boggles.
I think its good that
I think its good that Brown's been bounced out of an election. It means we have a government that's scared of the electorate. The last one was John Major where Kenneth Clarke was forced to abandon the Tories twelve year genuflection to the City of London and help the provinces and manufacturing industry.
Let's hope this pattern continues with the next parliament hung. And this present bounce means not only that Brown is going to have to avoid any adventures in Iran but also be serious about withdrawal from Iraq before he faces the electorate.
Murdoch and the City of London and the American neo-conservatives can go fuck themselves for the rest of this parliament.
Lt. Ehren K. Watada To White
Lt. Ehren K. Watada To White House - 'you're stark bollock naked son'.
came across this little treasure, apologies if its a repost.
Testimony of Professor of International Law Francis A. Boyle in the case of United States vs. Lt. Ehren K. Watada.
Let's hope this pattern
Let's hope this pattern continues with the next parliament hung.
Why the next parliament? Can't we do it to this one?
I bags being the hangman.
Re: The BOUNCE in politics. What if Brown, Cameron and a few others were thrown off the Blackpool Tower, or some other high building, then we could measure the BOUNCE after they hit the concrete below?
At least that BOUNCE would have a significant impact on the political world and for the better.
I thought the following was a good joke about elections and voting:
Whose lying about whom. The
Whose lying about whom.
The Telegraph's "other" Washington correspondent, Tim Shipman, presumably the neo-con one, posts this:
"Britain 'on board' for US strikes on Iran
By Tim Shipman in Washington
British defence officials have held talks with their Pentagon counterparts about how they could help out if America chose to bomb Iran.
The Sunday Telegraph has learned that President Bush's White House national security council is discussing instead a plan to launch pinpoint attacks on bases operated by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Quds force, blamed for training Iraqi militants.
Pentagon officials have revealed that President Bush won an understanding with Gordon Brown in July that Britain would support air strikes if they could be justified as a counter-terrorist operation..."
This to me sounds like a dig at Brown from the Washington neo-cons to remind him who he should be loyal to. But I think Gordon's too worried by the British electorate to risk that sort of thing.