Document Shows European Governments Agreed to Rendion Flights: If so, Blair and Staw must be lying.
The furore over the policy of Extraordinary Rendition that overshadowed Condi's trip to Europe, has in large part been a media furore.
Whilst the media have shouted, bloggers have blogged and the press have pressed, European Governments have gently probed and rattled their sabres, but there has been precious little action.
The US have been hinting that European Governments should shut up and mind their own business, or they might find their own involvement being highlighted ... and so it came to pass:
The EU agreed to give America access to facilities - presumably airports - in confidential talks in Athens during which the war on terror was discussed, the original minutes show. But all references to the agreement were deleted from the record before it was published.
The minutes of the Athens meeting on January 22, 2003, were written by the then Greek presidency of the EU after the talks with a US delegation headed by a justice department official. EU officials confirmed that a full account was circulated to all member governments, and would have been sent to the Home Office.
The document, entitled New Transatlantic Agenda, EU-US meeting on Justice and Home Affairs, details the subjects discussed by the 31 people present. The agenda included the fight against terrorism, drug trafficking and extradition agreements.
According to the full version, "Both sides agreed on areas where co-operation could be improved [inter alia] the exchange of data between border management services, increased use of European transit facilities to support the return of criminal/ inadmissible aliens, co-ordination with regard to false documents training and improving the co-operation in removals."
But this section, and others referring to US policy, were deleted - as a "courtesy" to Washington, according to a spokesman for the EU Council of Ministers.
It would appear that European Governments, including the UK, were not only aware of Rendition flights, they agreed to co-operate with them.
In light of this, perhaps Mr Blair would like to reconsider his parliamentary answers:
"Given that assurance, can the Prime Minister therefore explain why the published evidence shows that almost 400 flights have passed through 18 British airports in the period of concern? When was he as Prime Minister first made aware of that policy, and when did he approve it?"
(Prime Minister, HM Treasury):
"In respect of airports, I do not know what the right hon. Gentleman is referring to. In respect of the policy of rendition, it has been the policy of the American Government for many years."
And Jack Straw might like to reconsider his repeated statement to the Foreign Affairs Select Committee that:
The British Government has not received any requests, nor granted any permissions, for the use of UK territory or airspace for these purposes...
[both these quotes covered in more detail here]
For if the document says what the Telegraph suggests, then it is yet more evidence that our government have lied to us repeatedly and consistently about our involvement in the US policy of Extraordinary Rendition.
If Rendition is such a legitimate and valid tool in the fight against terrorism as Condi and Bliar suggest and doesn't involve the use of torture, then why have our government repeatedly lied to us about it?
Recent comments
1 week 2 days ago
1 week 2 days ago
1 week 2 days ago
1 week 5 days ago
2 weeks 12 hours ago
3 weeks 12 hours ago
3 weeks 23 hours ago
3 weeks 2 days ago
4 weeks 2 days ago
4 weeks 2 days ago