The al-Jazeera Memo and Peter Kilfoyle: As good as his word.

Peter Kilfoyle MP has been as good as his word. He told us, over the frozen Turkeys in Tesco before Christmas that we should be seeing some developments in the story about the al-Jazeera memo.

Those developments appear to be the fact that he and Tony Clarke leaked it to US sources last year, who apparently failed to follow through.

If Peter, or anybody else wants to get the information out there, us and 350+ bloggers who have signed up are ready and willing to publish, and risk prosecution under the OSA...

It also begs the question, if the government is prepared to prosecute two civil servants over leaking and receiving the document, why not two prominent Labour MPs.

We will see how successful the government are in that prosecution, as the trial of Keogh and O'Connor starts tomorrow...

The Official Secrets Act is looking rather impotent in the face of bloggers and the internet. A group of us working with Craig Murray in distributing the documents he released between Christmas and New Year managed to get them published on 4000+ websites in 48 hours. They can't prosecute all of us...

Two Labour MPs have defied the Official Secrets Act by passing on the contents of a secret British document revealing how President George Bush wanted to bomb the Arabic TV station, al-Jazeera.

The document, a transcript of a meeting between Mr Bush and Tony Blair in April 2004 when the prime minister expressed concern about US military tactics in Iraq, is already the subject of an unprecedented official secrets prosecution in Britain, against an aide to one of the MPs and another man.

David Keogh, a Cabinet Office employee, is charged with leaking information damaging to international relations to Leo O'Connor, researcher to Tony Clarke, former MP for Northampton South. The two are due to appear in court tomorrow for committal hearings.

The information was then acquired by Mr Clarke, who in turn consulted his parliamentary colleague, Peter Kilfoyle. The two politicians decided to pass on the information to a contact in the US.

Mr Kilfoyle, MP for Liverpool Walton and a former defence minister, said last night: "It's very odd we haven't been prosecuted. My colleague Tony Clarke is guilty of discussing it with me and I have discussed it with all and sundry."

Asked if he had broken the act in the same alleged way as Mr Clarke's aide who is facing charges, he said: "I don't know. But I'd be very pleased if Her Majesty's finest approached me about it."

The two MPs decided in October 2004 to reveal the contents of the transcript of the Blair-Bush meeting to John Latham, a Democrat supporter living in San Diego, California. They hoped to influence the impending 2004 US election, Mr Kilfoyle said.

In San Diego, Mr Latham, 71, a retired electrical engineer and a "contributing member" to the Democrat National Committee, told the Guardian that the MPs also wanted him to send letters with the information to newspapers in Los Angeles and New York. At a meeting at the House of Commons, he had been introduced to Mr Clarke by Mr Kilfoyle. Mr Latham, a British expatriate, and Mr Kilfoyle had attended the same school.

Mr Latham said he had never met Mr Clarke before. He added: "He mentioned that the document was a transcript of a meeting in Washington DC between Bush and Blair. There had been a proposal to take military action against al-Jazeera at their headquarters in Qatar. This was defused by Colin Powell, US secretary of state, and Tony Blair."

Mr Latham decided not to write to US newspapers at the time, in October 2004. As a result, details of the Washington meeting between Mr Bush and Mr Blair remained secret for more than a year. Within days of the charges being brought against Mr Keogh and Mr O'Connor, the contents of the memo were, however, passed on again, this time to the Daily Mirror, which put them on its front page.

Lord Goldsmith, the attorney general, unsuccessfully threatened other newspapers with the Official Secrets Act if they re-published the contents of the document.

Mr Kilfoyle told the Guardian that in May 2004, Mr Clarke - still a Labour MP - consulted him after he had received the transcript of the Bush-Blair meeting revealing Mr Bush's wish to bomb al-Jazeera.

"He told me what was in it," said Mr Kilfoyle. "He agonised and was very nervous. He decided the right thing to do was to return it." It was only after police arrested Mr O'Connor - Mr Clarke's aide - that the two politicians decided they should try to reveal the memo's contents in the US.

The Bush-Blair meeting took place when Whitehall officials, intelligence officers, and British military commanders were expressing outrage at the scale of the US assault on the Iraqi city of Falluja, in which up to 1,000 civilians are feared to have died. Pictures of the attack shown on al-Jazeera had infuriated US generals. London was also arguing with Washington about the number of extra British troops to be sent to Iraq.

A second, Foreign Office document, separately leaked in May 2004, exposed misgivings within the British government over America's "heavy-handed" behaviour and tactics in Iraq. That memo said: "Heavy-handed US military tactics in Falluja and Najaf some weeks ago have fuelled both Sunni and Shi'ite opposition to the coalition, and lost us much public support inside Iraq."

More than a "hat tip" to Peter Kilfoyle, for standing up to be counted.
lefti.blogspot.com has picked it up stateside, and it might be worth keeping an eye on the Washington Note for more developments.

I am going to start

I am going to start preparing for this one - get Chris onboard with some copy early this time - build another RSS scraper and use my diaries at Daily Kos, Booman, European Tribune, TPMcafe and Democratic Underground to disseminate this fast. Any Audio, Video on the matter or links - feel free to pass them along to Empire Burlesque. The page will be here later. You can reach me here by email.

Logo is here

Polizeros has picked it up

Polizeros has picked it up too, linking to you. I wanted to see your reaction before bloggin it.

I do pen a few words - and

I do pen a few words - and have actually worked professionally as a
journalist. But with Chris Floyd as my mate on the Empire Burlesque
project I'd rather not write. It's too much time... too much research -
and when he rips off the top of his head and let's go he's brilliant. It comes much easier for him.

I tend to stick to the research, graphics, coding, design and run the
server and let him unfurl the rhetoric. I am downloading a documentary
on al-Jazeera called 'Control Room', and will get it up in Flash 8
streaming later on tonight.

I heard a buzz that Latham may not have the actual documents - just
notes of what was said. If so - then it's a non story really. Sections
of the memo have already been disseminated.

I will be ready either way. Let's hope the memo turns up. I will add
your logo on the scraper page.

Hat tip to Kilfoyle for er,

Hat tip to Kilfoyle for er, telling one person who then chickened out, yes that'll show'em.

Yes, why did Kilfoyle not

Yes, why did Kilfoyle not keep a copy? It's all well and good us scrambling about trying to find it now, but he actually had it in his hands and lost it!

And WHY did Kilfoyle vote

And WHY did Kilfoyle vote for the SCOPA legislation on 7th February?